Information For Reviewers

1. Reviewer Responsibilities

As a reviewer for our journal, your responsibilities include:

• Evaluate the academic quality, originality, and scientific rigor of the manuscript.
• Identify potential flaws, limitations, or areas for improvement in the research.
• Provide specific and constructive feedback to help the authors improve their paper.
• Ensure a fair and unbiased evaluation, free from personal or institutional biases.
• Adhere to the agreed-upon review timeline; if there are delays, please notify the editorial office in advance.

2. Review Criteria

When evaluating manuscripts, please focus on the following aspects:

• Academic Value: Is the research novel? Does it make a meaningful contribution to the field?
• Methodological Reliability: Are the experimental design, data collection, and analysis scientifically valid?
• Results and Conclusions: Are the findings adequately supported by the data? Is the discussion thorough?
• Writing Quality: Is the manuscript well - structured? Are the language, figures, and tables appropriate?
• Ethical Compliance: Does the research comply with academic ethics (e.g., data integrity, proper citation)?

3. Confidentiality Policy

• Reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality — do not share the manuscript content or use unpublished data.
• If you suspect academic misconduct (e.g., plagiarism, data fabrication), please report it directly to the editorial office — do not handle it alone.
• After the review, do not retain copies of the manuscript or use its unpublished findings.